tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6180226403686462298.post4340498126148658955..comments2024-03-01T01:18:46.480-06:00Comments on Political Heat: There should be limits on how long a Supreme Court justice can serveUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6180226403686462298.post-43538601106738722882017-02-01T09:09:10.478-06:002017-02-01T09:09:10.478-06:00I think two 10-year appointments is a good idea al...I think two 10-year appointments is a good idea also. Regardless of how an amendment could change the Court, the important thing is that a change should occur. Chris Walkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09820378069472929510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6180226403686462298.post-61856923682271707482017-02-01T06:28:41.796-06:002017-02-01T06:28:41.796-06:00I believe in a similar comcept- justices have 10-y...I believe in a similar comcept- justices have 10-year appointments, and can be reappointed once, for a maximum of 20 years on the bench.<br /><br /> There is ZERO reason someone like Clarence Thomas is still around, or why we should be stuck with John Roberts for 30 years. Our Constitution allows for amendments to reflect changes in reality since 1787, and life expectancy is one of these things<br /> Jake formerly of the LPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15660401299391001751noreply@blogger.com