Thursday, July 7, 2016

Sen. Nass gets flustered about study of gay sexuality at UW, threatens spending cuts

Nass shouldn't meddle in the business of UW studies

State Sen. Steve Nass, a Republican from Whitewater, isn’t too thrilled with the curriculum in a certain Sociology class at the University of Wisconsin.

The homework assignment, assigned by UW Sociology lecturer Jason Nolen, asks students to read “an essay on gay men's sexual desires,” according to Channel 3000. The vague description likely alludes to a class that Nolen is teaching on sexuality, a broad topic that isn’t too uncommon on college campuses across the nation.

But the specific nature of the assignment -- homosexual desires -- has Sen. Nass all in a tizzy. It’s got him so frustrated that he’s doing what other Wisconsin Republicans have done over the past couple of weeks: he’s threatening funding cuts to the UW.
[Nass has] challenged [UW] leaders to give him their thoughts on the essay, cautioning them that their responses will play a role in evaluating the system's 2017-2019 budget request.
(Emphasis added)

To which I respond with a deserving facepalm.

Nass is attacking a well-respected member of the UW Sociology department. Jason Nolen has received high commendations for his work, and is consistently given great marks from students themselves on (currently a 4.6 out of 5.0 average).

But Nass’s reprehensible actions go beyond attacking a respected faculty member. It’s also childish to threaten spending cuts on the basis of a singular topic at any given university. Should every UW faculty member be subjected to the same type of scrutiny that Nass is proposing here? It’d be impractical, and foolish.

More likely than not, Nass has a problem with the subject matter involving homosexuality. But human sexuality comes in many forms, including homosexual, and Nass can’t do anything about that, no matter what his tastes may be -- and nor should he be able to. The preferences of Wisconsin legislators should play no role in the curriculum of UW classes, plain and simple.

This isn’t Nass’s first foray into the business of the UW. Earlier this year, Nass was critical (to put it mildly) of attempts to correct racial disparities on campus. From the Cap Times in January:
“President Cross needs to stop wasting time appeasing the political correctness crowd demanding safe-spaces, safe-words, universal apologies for hurt feelings, and speech/thought police,” Nass said in a statement.
Perhaps it’s Nass who needs a reality check. Racism needs to be addressed on our campuses, and human sexuality deserves to be studied in sociology classes. Nass has no business trying to interfere with the university’s proven track record of success, and he should be removed from the higher educational committee he currently sits on.


  1. He also opposed a celebration of protest art posters and threatened funding as well.

  2. Hey ......if he can get everyone focused on this issue, and the bathroom issue and some other fault of the U W ....then he doesn't have to deal with our crap roads, the polluted Kewaunee county wells nor the problems schools are having without enough funds to operate. He is a clown who should be wearing a red nose in the Senate!

  3. Nass is just sliding into the spot left by Glenn Grothman. He's been the understudy for years. And you're right about the subject matter. I think Mr. Nass doth protest too much.

    1. Quick check of nASS's bio does not show a mention of marriage or kids. I think you may be onto sonething, Anon.

    2. Nass has an out-of-wedlock child. This does not indicate sexual preference.

    3. Nass has an out-of-wedlock child. This does not indicate sexual preference.

    4. Even better! Yet that jagbag hasn't dound a crazy abortion bill he won't vote for.

  4. I wrote to Senator Nass, and my letter reads in part:

    Despite your anti-gay bias, I have to give you credit for maintaining a keen interest in the sexual habits of homosexuals.

    I would like to share an academic research study with you. Research teams from three leading Universities studied human behavior, and specifically the intense and visceral fear of homosexuals, discriminatory bias, implicit hostility towards gays, and endorsement of anti-gay policies. They concluded that fear, anxiety, and the strong aversion that some seemingly heterosexual people hold toward gays and lesbians often times grow out of their own repressed same-sex desires. You might want to take a look at that.

    In the meantime, please leave your anti-LGBT feelings out of the public square. It's not nice, it's insensitive, it's unwelcoming, it's discriminatory, it's mean, it's inhumane, it's ill-mannered, it's bigoted, and unbecoming for an elected representative of the people to behave so badly. And leave UW alone.

    Roy Steele

    The study is linked here: